[ (Click here).]

[Previous]
May 16, 1998 Reader Survey Results
 [Next]

In our very first OS/2 e-Zine! Reader Survey, we asked our readers what type of machine they used to run OS/2. Over a year has passed since then and we though it was time to update our survey results. Have OS/2ers updated their equipment to take advantage of newer and faster Intel processors? Have they moved on to alternative suppliers such as AMD or Cyrix? To find out, last issue we asked about "You Hardware and Software".

Answers to our survey were accepted from May 16th until May 29th. We had a total of 1,704 replies to our questionnaire with 90 "spoiled" entries (replies were considered "spoiled" if they did not contain an e-mail address, if all questions were not answered or if they were duplicates). This left 1,614 valid replies. The results were as follows:

Type and Speed of CPU

Our first two questions last time asked readers to indicate their CPU type and speed. For reasons of convenience and relevance, we combined these answers into one CPU/Speed rating (for example, Intel Pentium 166 Mhz).

There seems to have been a marked shift in CPU choices since our initial hardware survey. At that time Intel had a clear lead (72.2% of all our readers chose an Intel CPU of some kind), but Cyrix seemed a strong contender to the throne with 12.7% of our readers choosing chips from that manufacturer. There has been a radical shift in market share in the last year with Intel chips being used by just 40.0% of our readers now. However, Cyrix has not made significant gains in that same time; their use was reported by only 12.8% of our readers -- a gain of only one tenth of a percent.

AMD is the big winner in this race. Last year roughly 9.6% of OS/2ers were using AMD chips to run their machines. Now 21.8% of you report that you have one in your system. The bulk of these AMD users have purchased the popular K6 chips, notably the 200 Mhz (4.8%) and 233 Mhz (7.0%) versions.

While Intel did lose market share overall, they were, of course, still the leader in our poll. And they also still had the largest single group of users -- those with a Pentium 133 Mhz CPU. Also, the Pentium Pro did not show big gains in popularity in the past year, but it did increase from 7.2% use last time to 8.9% this time. And naturally, there were as clear shift to the faster Pentium MMX and Pentium II machines this time.

No readers reported that their primary OS/2 machines were running on PowerPC chips.

Number of CPUs

Last year, as expected, the vast majority of readers (97.3%) were using machines with only one CPU. This year results were essentially similar, but with a slight decrease (97.0%) of single-chip machines. The difference seems to have been made up by a slight increase in users with 2 CPUs in their machines; last time 1.9%, this time 2.4%. Since we offered a fill in the blank space this time around, users were able to indicate exactly how many CPUs they have, and remarkably, two lucky souls out there have 200 and 250 CPUs, respectively. Now those are machines that could be used to crack encryption!

Amount of RAM

As with the Number of CPUs, we offered a fill in the blank style answer space for the amount of RAM our readers have this time (as opposed to a multiple choice list last time). The results, not surprisingly considering the nosedive in RAM prices over the past year, show most people moving to more and more memory. While last year revealed the majority of our readers (57.3%) had 32 Meg or less, things have shifted greatly now, with 61.0% of OS/2ers reporting 64 Meg or more.

The single largest group (39.2%) reports 64 Meg exactly, and 10.6% of readers have 128 Meg, two amounts common for obvious reasons. However, there are still significant numbers of OS/2ers with only 32 Meg in their machines -- 22.2%, to be exact.

Total Hard Disk Size

The results from our question on hard disk size were a nightmare to calculate. Despite the fact that we offered a blank where readers were meant to enter the number of Megabytes of hard disk they had available, we were overwhelmed by the variety of capacities, and the variety of ways people chose to indicate those capacities. We saw everything from "2" (clearly meaning 2 Gigabytes, since 2 Megabytes is not enough hard drive room to install DOS 6.0, let alone OS/2) to 10,000,000 (which we assumed was meant to be 10 Gigabytes, not 10,000,000 Megabytes -- at least we don't think anyone out there has 10 Terabytes in their machines!). And we also received every variation you can imagine in between: 3.2; 3,2; 3.0 G; 3Gig; 5Gb; etc. Needless to say, manual sorting was required.

Next year when we repeat this survey, we will use a less imprecise form, possibly something like:

Hard Disk: . Kilobytes Megabytes Gigabytes Terabytes

So keep in mind that the results for this question, as all results from our surveys, should not be viewed as 100% accurate.

Having said that, we can say that the "bigger is better" trend is also working in the hard drive market. No significant numbers of our readers (only 5.6%) are using anything less than 1 Gigabyte drives. Over half (50.1%) had drives between 2.0 and 4.5 Gig. Astoundingly, unless we misinterpreted the results of our survey, there are people out there with 60, 62 and 83.5 Gigabyte hard drives!

Hard Disk Type(s)

While the expected majority of users (59.4%) have exclusively IDE/EIDE hard drives in their systems, we found from our survey that a reasonably large group (39.3%) have only SCSI or both SCSI and IDE/EIDE. Probably these people chose SCSI devices for their superior performance with a true multitasking OS.

Base OS/2 Version

Finally we asked our readers what version of OS/2 they are using. Last year we found that the majority of OS/2ers (76.8%) had moved on to Warp 4 without much hesitation. This year we find that that number has grown even more. Now 88.0% of our readers say they are using Warp 4, while only a handful (10.0%) are still using Warp 3.

* * *

That's it for this month. Don't forget to fill out this month's questionnaire and check back on June 13th for complete results.


Complete May 16, 1998 Survey Results

Type and Speed of CPU

CategoryCountPercentage
AMD Am486 (50 Mhz)10.1%
AMD Am486 (66 Mhz)30.2%
AMD Am486 (80 Mhz)40.2%
AMD Am486 (100 Mhz)191.2%
AMD Am486 (120 Mhz)40.2%
AMD Am486 (133 Mhz)10.1%
AMD Am5x86 (90 Mhz)10.1%
AMD Am5x86 (100 Mhz)30.2%
AMD Am5x86 (120 Mhz)10.1%
AMD Am5x86 (133 Mhz)281.7%
AMD Am5x86 (150 Mhz)20.1%
AMD Am5x86 (160 Mhz)60.4%
AMD Am5x86 (167 Mhz)10.1%
AMD Am5x86 (200 Mhz)10.1%
AMD-K5 (75 Mhz)20.1%
AMD-K5 (100 Mhz)20.1%
AMD-K5 (120 Mhz)10.1%
AMD-K5 (133 Mhz)110.7%
AMD-K5 (166 Mhz)90.6%
AMD-K5 (200 Mhz)10.1%
AMD-K6 (120 Mhz)10.1%
AMD-K6 (133 Mhz)10.1%
AMD-K6 (166 Mhz)201.2%
AMD-K6 (188 Mhz)10.1%
AMD-K6 (200 Mhz)784.8%
AMD-K6 (207.5 Mhz)10.1%
AMD-K6 (210 Mhz)10.1%
AMD-K6 (225 Mhz)60.4%
AMD-K6 (230 Mhz)10.1%
AMD-K6 (233 Mhz)1137.0%
AMD-K6 (262.5 Mhz)10.1%
AMD-K6 (266 Mhz)70.4%
AMD-K6 (300 Mhz)30.2%
AMD-K6 (337.5 Mhz)10.1%
AMD / NexGen Nx586 (90 Mhz)10.1%
AMD / NexGen Nx586 (100 Mhz)10.1%
AMD / NexGen Nx586 (110 Mhz)10.1%
Cyrix 486DX2 (66 Mhz)20.1%
Cyrix 486DX2 (80 Mhz)30.2%
Cyrix 5x86 (100 Mhz)50.3%
Cyrix 5x86 (120 Mhz)30.2%
Cyrix 5x86 (133 Mhz)40.2%
Cyrix 5x86 (150 Mhz)20.1%
Cyrix 5x86 (166 Mhz)40.2%
Cyrix 5x86 (200 Mhz)10.1%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86 (100 Mhz)30.2%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86 (110 Mhz)10.1%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86 (120 Mhz)90.6%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86 (133 Mhz)221.4%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86 (166 Mhz)291.8%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86 (150 Mhz)201.2%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86 (153 Mhz)10.1%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86 (150/200 Mhz)10.1%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86 (200 Mhz)50.3%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86L (133 Mhz)60.4%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86L (150 Mhz)60.4%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86L (166 Mhz)60.4%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86L (200 Mhz)191.2%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86MX (120 Mhz)10.1%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86MX (150 Mhz)10.1%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86MX (166 Mhz)40.2%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86MX (200 Mhz)211.3%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86MX (233 Mhz)120.7%
Cyrix / IBM 6x86MX (266 Mhz)10.1%
Cyrix M II (150 Mhz)10.1%
Cyrix M II (166 Mhz)10.1%
Cyrix M II (200 Mhz)10.1%
IBM Blue Lightning (66 Mhz)20.1%
IBM Blue Lightning (75 Mhz)10.1%
Intel 386 (20 Mhz)10.1%
Intel 486 (25 Mhz)40.2%
Intel 486 (33 Mhz)70.4%
Intel 486 (40 Mhz)10.1%
Intel 486 (50 Mhz)130.8%
Intel 486 (66 Mhz)332.0%
Intel 486 (75 Mhz)40.2%
Intel 486 (80 Mhz)20.1%
Intel 486 (100 Mhz)181.1%
Intel 486 (120 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium (60 Mhz)60.4%
Intel Pentium (66 Mhz)20.1%
Intel Pentium (70 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium (75 Mhz)281.7%
Intel Pentium (83 Mhz)30.2%
Intel Pentium (90 Mhz)503.1%
Intel Pentium (100 Mhz)583.6%
Intel Pentium (120 Mhz)372.3%
Intel Pentium (122 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium (133 Mhz)1489.2%
Intel Pentium (150 Mhz)211.3%
Intel Pentium (160 Mhz)20.1%
Intel Pentium (166 Mhz)935.8%
Intel Pentium (180 Mhz)20.1%
Intel Pentium (200 Mhz)553.4%
Intel Pentium (225 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium (233 Mhz)50.3%
Intel Pentium MMX (133 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium MMX (150 Mhz)40.2%
Intel Pentium MMX (166 Mhz)503.1%
Intel Pentium MMX (180 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium MMX (200 Mhz)945.8%
Intel Pentium MMX (220 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium MMX (225 Mhz)30.2%
Intel Pentium MMX (233 Mhz)442.7%
Intel Pentium MMX (250 Mhz)20.1%
Intel Pentium MMX (262 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium MMX (266 Mhz)20.1%
Intel Pentium MMX (290 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium Pro (180 Mhz)150.9%
Intel Pentium Pro (150 Mhz)60.4%
Intel Pentium Pro (166 Mhz)20.1%
Intel Pentium Pro (200 Mhz)1096.8%
Intel Pentium Pro (233 Mhz)80.5%
Intel Pentium Pro (266 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium Pro (300 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium II (180 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium II (200 Mhz)20.1%
Intel Pentium II (233 Mhz)332.0%
Intel Pentium II (266 Mhz)352.2%
Intel Pentium II (300 Mhz)301.9%
Intel Pentium II (330 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium II (333 Mhz)40.2%
Intel Pentium II (338 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium II (350 Mhz)20.1%
Intel Pentium II (400 Mhz)40.2%
Intel Pentium II (466 Mhz)10.1%
Intel Pentium II (500 Mhz)10.1%
Other AMD (133 Mhz)20.1%
Other AMD (200 Mhz)10.1%
Other Cyrix (50 Mhz)10.1%
Other Cyrix (100 Mhz)10.1%
Other Cyrix (133 Mhz)10.1%
Other Cyrix (166 Mhz)10.1%
Other IBM (50 Mhz)10.1%
Other IBM (100 Mhz)20.1%
Other IBM (200 Mhz)10.1%
Other Intel (83 Mhz)10.1%
Other Unspecified (50 Mhz)10.1%
Other Unspecified (89 Mhz)10.1%
Other Unspecified (100 Mhz)10.1%
Other Unspecified (110 Mhz)10.1%
Other Unspecified (133 Mhz)10.1%
Other Unspecified (180 Mhz)10.1%
TOTAL1,614101.6%

Number of CPUs

CategoryCountPercentage
11,56697.0%
2392.4%
310.1%
410.1%
510.1%
1020.1%
20010.1%
25010.1%
TOTAL1,614100.0%

Amount of RAM

CategoryCountPercentage
8 Meg30.2%
10 Meg10.1%
11 Meg10.1%
12 Meg20.1%
16 Meg332.0%
20 Meg161.0%
24 Meg352.2%
28 Meg30.2%
29 Meg10.1%
32 Meg35922.2%
36 Meg50.3%
38 Meg10.1%
40 Meg553.4%
44 Meg10.1%
47 Meg10.1%
48 Meg1116.9%
54 Meg10.1%
56 Meg10.1%
60 Meg10.1%
64 Meg63339.2%
65 Meg30.2%
72 Meg60.4%
73 Meg10.1%
74 Meg10.1%
80 Meg452.8%
90 Meg30.2%
95 Meg10.1%
96 Meg754.6%
97 Meg20.1%
98 Meg90.6%
104 Meg20.1%
108 Meg10.1%
128 Meg17110.6%
131 Meg10.1%
132 Meg20.1%
160 Meg20.1%
166 Meg10.1%
192 Meg40.2%
196 Meg30.2%
224 Meg10.1%
256 Meg120.7%
384 Meg20.1%
2047 Meg10.1%
TOTAL1,614100.4%

Total Hard Disk Size

CategoryCountPercentage
100 Meg20.1%
116 Meg10.1%
120 Meg10.1%
250 Meg30.2%
258 Meg10.1%
260 Meg20.1%
295 Meg10.1%
300 Meg10.1%
302 Meg10.1%
320 Meg10.1%
400 Meg10.1%
420 Meg10.1%
440 Meg10.1%
500 Meg40.2%
512 Meg20.1%
520 Meg10.1%
540 Meg70.4%
551 Meg10.1%
560 Meg10.1%
600 Meg40.2%
611 Meg10.1%
650 Meg20.1%
660 Meg10.1%
680 Meg10.1%
695 Meg10.1%
700 Meg10.1%
730 Meg10.1%
740 Meg10.1%
780 Meg10.1%
800 Meg100.6%
820 Meg10.1%
840 Meg20.1%
850 Meg90.6%
853 Meg10.1%
860 Meg10.1%
880 Meg30.2%
900 Meg40.2%
940 Meg10.1%
1.0 Gig442.7%
1.1 Gig60.4%
1.2 Gig462.9%
1.3 Gig191.2%
1.4 Gig70.4%
1.5 Gig150.9%
1.6 Gig311.9%
1.7 Gig161.0%
1.8 Gig70.4%
1.9 Gig20.1%
2.0 Gig1006.2%
2.1 Gig603.7%
2.2 Gig130.8%
2.3 Gig80.5%
2.4 Gig90.6%
2.5 Gig633.9%
2.6 Gig100.6%
2.7 Gig50.3%
2.8 Gig90.6%
2.9 Gig40.2%
3.0 Gig925.7%
3.1 Gig241.5%
3.2 Gig644.0%
3.3 Gig161.0%
3.4 Gig110.7%
3.5 Gig251.5%
3.6 Gig80.5%
3.7 Gig120.7%
3.8 Gig60.4%
4.0 Gig1096.8%
4.1 Gig271.7%
4.2 Gig171.1%
4.3 Gig734.5%
4.4 Gig60.4%
4.5 Gig352.2%
4.6 Gig80.5%
4.7 Gig20.1%
4.8 Gig90.6%
5.0 Gig543.3%
5.1 Gig100.6%
5.2 Gig80.5%
5.3 Gig70.4%
5.4 Gig30.2%
5.5 Gig140.9%
5.6 Gig50.3%
5.7 Gig40.2%
5.8 Gig30.2%
5.9 Gig20.1%
6.0 Gig573.5%
6.1 Gig40.2%
6.2 Gig100.6%
6.3 Gig90.6%
6.4 Gig392.4%
6.5 Gig171.1%
6.6 Gig10.1%
6.7 Gig30.2%
6.8 Gig50.3%
7.0 Gig291.8%
7.1 Gig20.1%
7.2 Gig10.1%
7.4 Gig40.2%
7.5 Gig70.4%
7.6 Gig40.2%
7.8 Gig10.1%
7.9 Gig10.1%
8.0 Gig392.4%
8.1 Gig30.2%
8.2 Gig60.4%
8.4 Gig100.6%
8.5 Gig40.2%
8.6 Gig20.1%
8.9 Gig30.2%
9.0 Gig241.5%
9.1 Gig40.2%
9.2 Gig10.1%
9.3 Gig10.1%
9.4 Gig10.1%
9.5 Gig40.2%
9.6 Gig50.3%
9.7 Gig20.1%
10.0 Gig221.4%
10.1 Gig10.1%
10.2 Gig20.1%
10.4 Gig10.1%
10.5 Gig10.1%
10.7 Gig10.1%
11.0 Gig50.3%
11.2 Gig20.1%
11.3 Gig10.1%
11.6 Gig10.1%
12.0 Gig171.1%
12.6 Gig10.1%
12.8 Gig20.1%
12.0 Gig10.1%
13.0 Gig40.2%
13.4 Gig10.1%
14.0 Gig40.2%
14.8 Gig10.1%
15.0 Gig60.4%
15.3 Gig10.1%
16.0 Gig60.4%
16.4 Gig10.1%
16.8 Gig10.1%
17.0 Gig10.1%
18.0 Gig20.1%
19.0 Gig10.1%
20.0 Gig20.1%
22.0 Gig20.1%
25.0 Gig10.1%
31.0 Gig10.1%
32.0 Gig10.1%
33.4 Gig10.1%
44.0 Gig30.2%
47.0 Gig10.1%
51.0 Gig10.1%
54.0 Gig10.1%
60.0 Gig10.1%
62.0 Gig10.1%
83.5 Gig10.1%
TOTAL1614101.5%

Hard Disk Type(s)

CategoryCountPercentage
IDE/EIDE95959.4%
SCSI43527.0%
Both19812.3%
I don't know10.1%
TOTAL1,61498.8%

Base OS/2 Version

CategoryCountPercentage
OS/2 1.x00.0%
OS/2 2.x00.0%
OS/2 2.x SMP20.1%
OS/2 for the PowerPC00.0%
OS/2 Warp Server191.2%
OS/2 Warp 316110.0%
OS/2 Warp 41,42188.0%
Other100.6%
TOTAL1,61499.9%


[Previous]
 [Index]
 [Feedback]
 [Next]

[Our Sponsor: Indelible Blue - OS/2 software and hardware solutions to customers worldwide.]

Copyright © 1998 - Falcon Networking ISSN 1203-5696